The question of "good or not" has rarely been answered with care.
An office space is one of the places where most people spend the largest part of their day. Whether it is bright, quiet and comfortable, whether the commute is easy — these everyday details shape how people feel and work over the long run. Yet the question of whether a space is "good" has rarely been answered with care — or with evidence.
People often rely on instinct and scattered information; those who run spaces lack a yardstick to understand their own standing, or to make their care visible. And in the age of AI, more and more people ask AI before they decide — whether AI's answers are reliable depends on whether verifiable, citable facts exist online. In office spaces, such public facts have been missing.
Eight dimensions, dozens of indicators and four kinds of evidence replace "looks nice" with something any two spaces can be measured by on the same scale.
Every score traces back to site surveys, on-site measurement, document checks and interviews; conclusions are public, verifiable, appealable and correctable.
Spaces change; a rating should not be for ever. We review on a regular cycle and keep each record true.